Georgia · PWS GA0090001 · BALDWIN County

Milledgeville

What Milledgeville filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2022 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2022
46.2%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-95c40651bc79.xlsxFinal H155

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,809 sheet Final, cell H155 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 973.3 sheet Final, cell I155 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-95c40651bc79.xlsx (SHA-256 95c40651bc79c569), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$22,500
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-95c40651bc79.xlsxFinal Z155

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 22,506 sheet Final, cell Z155

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-95c40651bc79.xlsx (SHA-256 95c40651bc79c569), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

46.2% non-revenue water in FY2022, higher than 90% of the 222 Georgia systems that filed that year.

46.2% non-revenue water in FY2022, against 222 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 222 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.2%. This system is 46.2%. 5 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 46.2%Georgia median 25.2%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 9.9 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 35% to 54% between FY2020 and FY2021. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

12 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 6 are health-based. 8 resolved, 4 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

What is missing from this record, and why

EPD published 3 filings for Milledgeville that this page does not show: FY2023–FY2025. Milledgeville did file, and the filing is in EPD's published results.

It is absent here because its published identifier belongs to a system in another county, filed as GA2270000. Publishing it under that identifier would attribute this utility's water balance to a different named system, and deciding which system a contradicting filing belongs to is not a decision this pipeline is allowed to make. Read the gap as ours, not as a utility that stopped reporting.

Water balance, FY2022 · 1,809 MG system input
Billed 973.3 MG Unbilled authorized 6.88 MG Apparent loss 4.87 MG Real loss 823.9 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,809 MG sheet Final, cell H155 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 973.3 MG sheet Final, cell I155 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 6.88 MG sheet Final, cell K155 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 4.87 MG sheet Final, cell O155
  • Real loss 823.9 MG sheet Final, cell P155

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-95c40651bc79.xlsx (SHA-256 95c40651bc79c569), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2011–2022
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2022 46.2% 1,809 $22,500
2021 53.9% 1,658 $18,000
2020 34.8% 1,426 $56,000
2019 34.0% 1,503 $109,000
2018 48.4% 1,977 $119,000
2017 29.9% 1,446 $108,000
2016 22.4% 1,403 $59,700
2015 17.8% 1,221 $54,300
2014 24.3% 940.9 $48,200
2013 33.5% 1,011 $94,100
2012 26.3% 1,009 $100,000
2011 39.2% 1,222 $104,000

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Baldwin CountyBALDWIN County 33.9% FY2025
Villa Rica3,300–10,000 connections 36.3% FY2025
Demorest3,300–10,000 connections 32.7% FY2025
Jasper3,300–10,000 connections 46.1% FY2025
Powder Springs3,300–10,000 connections 26.1% FY2018
Haralson County3,300–10,000 connections 38.8% FY2025
St. Marys3,300–10,000 connections 8.5% FY2025
Americus3,300–10,000 connections 10.1% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $22,500 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Milledgeville

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Milledgeville — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/milledgeville/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.