Georgia · PWS GA0390001 · CAMDEN County

St. Marys

What St. Marys filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
8.5%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H201

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 640.8 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H201 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 586.3 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I201 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$9,000
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z201

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 8,999 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z201

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

8.5% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 9% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

8.5% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 8.5%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 8.5%Georgia median 26.4%

Compliance record

98 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 8 are health-based. 17 resolved, 76 archived, and 5 still open.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • FY2019 reports a leakage index of 0.020359934501210025, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 640.8 MG system input
Billed 586.3 MG Unbilled authorized 3.06 MG Apparent loss 2.93 MG Real loss 48.6 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 640.8 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H201 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 586.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I201 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 3.06 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K201 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 2.93 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O201
  • Real loss 48.6 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P201

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2011–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 8.5% 640.8 $9,000
2024 15.2% 642.2 $8,360
2023 8.0% 561.7 $7,930
2022 12.3% 570.8 $7,690
2021 10.0% 522.3 $7,220
2020 7.9% 504.5 $7,440
2019 6.7% 463.4 $38,900
2018 9.9% 485.8 $118,000
2017 26.3% 526.8 $59,000
2016 16.8% 517.2 $65,000
2015 18.1% 514.4 $63,800
2014 19.9% 510 $68,200
2013 10.5% 835.5 $24,800
2012 15.6% 509.8 $70,200
2011 18.0% 538.4 $72,700

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
KingslandCAMDEN County 18.2% FY2025
Usn-kings Bay Submarine BaseCAMDEN County 8.4% FY2025
Americus3,300–10,000 connections 10.1% FY2025
Lafayette3,300–10,000 connections 47.5% FY2025
Jasper3,300–10,000 connections 46.1% FY2025
Demorest3,300–10,000 connections 32.7% FY2025
Waycross3,300–10,000 connections 20.5% FY2025
Fayetteville3,300–10,000 connections 14.9% FY2020

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $9,000 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about St. Marys

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “St. Marys — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/st-marys/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.