Georgia · PWS GA1350005 · GWINNETT County

Lawrenceville

What Lawrenceville filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2019 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2019
10.7%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx2019 Water Audits H135

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 767.9 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell H135 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 685.6 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell I135 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx (SHA-256 d59e6092c82b28b2), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what EPD publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
insufficient
The filing does not publish enough components to decompose system input.

What the record shows

10.7% non-revenue water in FY2019, higher than 13% of the 232 Georgia systems that filed that year.

10.7% non-revenue water in FY2019, against 232 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 232 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.4%. This system is 10.7%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 10.7%Georgia median 25.4%

Compliance record

16 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 10 are health-based. 4 resolved, 12 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2019

This filing reports totals but not the components a balance is made of, so the identity input = billed + unbilled authorized + apparent loss + real loss has nothing to be tested against. Absent: apparent loss.

insufficient · not checkable

This is recorded as unverifiable and not reported as a pass. The difference is the one between a disclosure gap and a clean bill of health.

Filed history, 2011–2019
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2019 10.7% 767.9 insufficient
2018 18.4% 807.5 insufficient
2017 12.7% 789.4 insufficient
2016 6.3% 796.7 $122,000 inapplicable
2015 12.8% 810 $116,000 inapplicable
2014 10.1% 774.4 $139,000 inapplicable
2013 15.2% 795.3 $136,000 inapplicable
2012 13.4% 825.7 $137,000 inapplicable
2011 9.5% 806.6 $131,000 inapplicable

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
BufordGWINNETT County 19.3% FY2025
Gwinnett County DwrGWINNETT County 9.6% FY2025
Douglas3,300–10,000 connections 22.6% FY2025
Moultrie3,300–10,000 connections 18.5% FY2016
Rincon3,300–10,000 connections 22.9% FY2025
Satilla Regional3,300–10,000 connections 9.3% FY2025
Thomson- McDuffie3,300–10,000 connections 25.5% FY2025
Ellijay Gilmer County Water And Sewer Auth3,300–10,000 connections 17.8% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Lawrenceville

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Lawrenceville — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/lawrenceville/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.