Georgia · PWS GA0690002 · COFFEE County

Douglas

What Douglas filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
22.6%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H73

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,384 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H73 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 1,071 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I73 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$303,000
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z73

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 303,062 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z73

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

22.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 39% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

22.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 22.6%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 22.6%Georgia median 26.4%

Compliance record

5 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 2 are health-based. 3 resolved, 2 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

What is missing from this record, and why

EPD published a filing for Douglas that this page does not show: FY2023. Douglas did file, and the filing is in EPD's published results.

It is absent here because two systems in one county filed under this identifier, and nothing in the file says which owns it, filed as GA0690002. Publishing it under that identifier would attribute this utility's water balance to a different named system, and deciding which system a contradicting filing belongs to is not a decision this pipeline is allowed to make. Read the gap as ours, not as a utility that stopped reporting.

Water balance, FY2025 · 1,384 MG system input
Billed 1,071 MG Unbilled authorized 2.68 MG Apparent loss 61.7 MG Real loss 248.7 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,384 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H73 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 1,071 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I73 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 2.68 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K73 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 61.7 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O73
  • Real loss 248.7 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P73

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2011–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 22.6% 1,384 $303,000
2024 17.1% 1,388 $329,000
2022 20.3% 1,301 $239,000
2021 15.9% 1,278 $255,000
2020 15.8% 1,202 $241,000
2019 13.7% 1,284 $248,000
2018 10.6% 1,203 $223,000
2017 11.0% 1,136 $217,000
2016 16.0% 1,192 $204,000
2015 26.9% 1,234 $185,000
2014 25.3% 1,316 $122,000
2013 16.5% 1,237 $118,000
2012 14.0% 1,256 $123,000
2011 15.6% 1,279 $67,900

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Douglas/oak ParkCOFFEE County 35.1% FY2022
Lawrenceville3,300–10,000 connections 10.7% FY2019
Moultrie3,300–10,000 connections 18.5% FY2016
Satilla Regional3,300–10,000 connections 9.3% FY2025
Rincon3,300–10,000 connections 22.9% FY2025
Thomson- McDuffie3,300–10,000 connections 25.5% FY2025
Lee County3,300–10,000 connections 11.6% FY2025
Ellijay Gilmer County Water And Sewer Auth3,300–10,000 connections 17.8% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $303,000 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Douglas

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Douglas — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/douglas/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.