Georgia · PWS GA1050001 · ELBERT County

Elberton

What Elberton filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
11.6%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H81

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 524.8 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H81 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 464 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I81 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$45,600
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z81

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 45,616 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z81

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

11.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 17% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

11.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 11.6%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 11.6%Georgia median 26.4%

Compliance record

4 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 2 resolved, 2 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2025 · 524.8 MG system input
Billed 464 MG Unbilled authorized 7.03 MG Apparent loss 10.2 MG Real loss 43.6 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 524.8 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H81 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 464 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I81 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 7.03 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K81 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 10.2 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O81
  • Real loss 43.6 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P81

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 11.6% 524.8 $45,600 inapplicable
2024 12.7% 588.5 $19,000 inapplicable
2023 15.2% 595.6 $35,600 insufficient
2022 18.0% 561.4 $31,700 insufficient
2021 14.8% 477 $33,300 insufficient
2020 16.2% 521.7 $34,400 inapplicable
2019 9.1% 558.4 $46,500 inapplicable
2018 12.2% 527.9 $45,400 inapplicable
2017 18.9% 553.7 $35,300 inapplicable
2016 17.8% 578.2 $36,800 inapplicable
2015 19.2% 554 $35,500 inapplicable
2014 13.4% 506.9 $33,300 inapplicable
2013 16.4% 495.8 $44,600 inapplicable
2012 17.7% 552.5 $46,600 inapplicable

Comparable systems

The same size band — 3,300–10,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Lavonia3,300–10,000 connections 25.4% FY2025
Heard County3,300–10,000 connections 51.4% FY2025
Dallas3,300–10,000 connections 37.2% FY2024
Pickens County3,300–10,000 connections 31.1% FY2025
Adairsville3,300–10,000 connections 11.1% FY2025
Effingham County Surface3,300–10,000 connections 7.7% FY2025
Lowndes Co.-south Lowndes Co. Ws3,300–10,000 connections 5.7% FY2025
Auburn3,300–10,000 connections 27.3% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $45,600 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Elberton

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Elberton — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/elberton/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.