Georgia · PWS GA1030131 · EFFINGHAM County

Effingham County Surface

What Effingham County Surface filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
7.7%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H80

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,121 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H80 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 1,034 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I80 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$16,100
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z80

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 16,133 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z80

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

7.7% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 7% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

7.7% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 7.7%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 7.7%Georgia median 26.4%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 8.4 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 24% to 8% between FY2024 and FY2025. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

8 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 4 resolved, 3 archived, and 1 still open.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • FY2015 reports a leakage index of 0.03, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 1,121 MG system input
Billed 1,034 MG Unbilled authorized 35.3 MG Apparent loss 5.17 MG Real loss 46.3 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,121 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H80 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 1,034 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I80 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 35.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K80 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 5.17 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O80
  • Real loss 46.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P80

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 7.7% 1,121 $16,100
2024 24.1% 1,004 $7,010
2023 7.8% 1,007 $8,540
2022 3.2% 975.6 $39,300
2021 3.6% 947.8 $40,500
2020 3.3% 985.9 $42,300
2019 13.9% 889.2 $2,410
2018 15.1% 758.3 $1,370
2017 9.2% 831.4 $1,740
2016 19.8% 751 $10,200
2015 14.4% 894.1 $6,720
2014 26.0% 621.7 $9,150
2013 36.6% 572.8 $8,080
2012 21.0% 814.7 $6,550

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
RinconEFFINGHAM County 22.9% FY2025
Adairsville3,300–10,000 connections 11.1% FY2025
Pickens County3,300–10,000 connections 31.1% FY2025
Lowndes Co.-south Lowndes Co. Ws3,300–10,000 connections 5.7% FY2025
Dallas3,300–10,000 connections 37.2% FY2024
Heard County3,300–10,000 connections 51.4% FY2025
Elberton3,300–10,000 connections 11.6% FY2025
Lavonia3,300–10,000 connections 25.4% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $16,100 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Effingham County Surface

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Effingham County Surface — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/effingham-county-surface/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.