Wisconsin · PWS 90

Alma Center Water

What Alma Center Water filed with PSC about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
7.4%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csvSheet1 H11

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 8.61 sheet Sheet1, cell H11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • billed authorized consumption 7.97 sheet Sheet1, cell I11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

From data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what PSC publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
inapplicable
PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

7.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 16% of the 562 Wisconsin systems that filed that year.

7.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 562 Wisconsin filings for the same yearA strip of 562 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 16.6%. This system is 7.4%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 7.4%Wisconsin median 16.6%

Debt outstanding, and what covers the interest

$750,950 of long-term debt outstanding at the end of 2025, across 3 bond issues. This is principal outstanding on the water utility's own balance sheet, on the Commission's own test: it files no electric operating report.

Principal outstanding at the end of each year, as filed
YearDebt outstandingIssuesNet revenueInterestCoverage
2025$750,9503$69,943$10,6986.54
2024$816,6493$74,728$11,6946.39
2023$881,3633$55,483$12,6764.38
2022$945,1063$55,376$13,6444.06
2021$1.0M3$23,598$14,3031.65
2020$849,0372$48,772$16,9122.88
2019$741,9582$42,047$14,5952.88
2018$480,1471$20,608$12,2981.68
2017$509,7861$21,174$10,0002.12
2016$538,8641$35,010$10,5573.32

6.54 — what Alma Center Water's net revenue was against its interest in 2025.

Net revenue over interest: the Commission's account 400 (operating revenue), less 401–402 (operation and maintenance), less 408 (taxes), divided by 427 plus 430 plus 431 (interest on long-term debt, on municipal advances, and other). Depreciation is filed under 403 and is not deducted, because what pays interest is cash.

This is not a debt service coverage ratio and must not be read as one. Debt service is principal repaid plus interest, and the principal repaid in a year is not filed anywhere in this source. A covenant ratio is defined in the bond documents, which set out their own revenues, their own operating expenses and their own exclusions. Two utilities with identical filed figures can have different covenant ratios.

Figures are as filed with the Commission under Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 185 and are not audited as presented. Nothing here is a credit opinion, an implied rating, or a judgement that any figure is sufficient. Source: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, annual report financial schedules, 2016–2025, retrieved 2026-09-12.

Water balance, FY2025 · 8.61 MG system input
Billed 7.97 MG Unbilled authorized 0.07 MG Apparent loss 0 MG Real loss 0.57 MG

PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 8.61 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • Billed authorized 7.97 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Unbilled authorized 0.07 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Apparent loss 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell R11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Real loss 0.57 MG sheet Sheet1, cell U11 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

From data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2025
Year NRW Input (MG)
2025 7.4% 8.61
2024 4.5% 9.23
2023 0.3% 9.67
2022 20.8% 10.8
2021 13.7% 9.1
2020 19.3% 9.66
2019 15.8% 9.44
2018 11.8% 9.83
2017 18.7% 9.75
2016 12.1% 9.96

Other Wisconsin systems

PSC publishes no county or connection count for these systems, so they cannot be ranked against this one. These are other filers, not comparables.

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Alma Center Water

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Alma Center Water — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/alma-center-water/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.