Texas · PWS TX2000003 · RUNNELS County

Winters

What Winters filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2023
46.8%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
Recoverable annually
$276,039
As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.
Balance check
closed
The filed water balance closes.

Read this page as markdown →

What the filing says

Winters serves 1,201 retail connections and about 2,785 people. Because it reports fewer than 3,300 connections, it is on a five-year water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

46.8% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 95% of the 785 Texas systems that filed that year.

The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 14.2 points a year, against a Texas median of 5.79, including 18.1% to 50.9% between FY2016 and FY2018. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.
Water balance, FY2023 · 116.6 MG system input
Billed 62 MG Unbilled authorized 0.15 MG Apparent loss 0.94 MG Real loss 53.5 MG

Components sum to within 0.00% of reported system input, inside the 0.5% tolerance.

Filed history, 2016–2023
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2023 46.8% 116.6 $276,039 closed
2022 44.0% 134.1 $238,336 closed
2018 50.9% 129 $509,288 closed
2016 18.1% 76.4 $44,972 closed

How to read the recoverable figure

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed — under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued at the retail rate, because recovering it is revenue, and it is recoverable inside a budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only: eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water, not what it would have sold for. Adding those two at the same rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes.

As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.

Comparable systems

Same county, or the same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
North Runnels Water Supply CorpRUNNELS County 28.8%
BallingerRUNNELS County 14.5%
MilesRUNNELS County 5.5%
Harris County MUD 2571,000–3,300 connections 3.1%
Blanco1,000–3,300 connections 22.1%
Montgomery County WCID 11,000–3,300 connections 13.4%
Lometa Regional1,000–3,300 connections 60.6%
White Shed Water Supply Corp1,000–3,300 connections 28.1%

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $276,039 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Winters

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.