Texas · PWS TX1700317 · MONTGOMERY County

Towering Oaks And Rosewood Hills Subdivi

What Towering Oaks And Rosewood Hills Subdivi filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2020–2020 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2020
24.8%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
Recoverable annually
$16,973
As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.
Balance check
closed
The filed water balance closes.

Read this page as markdown →

What the filing says

Towering Oaks And Rosewood Hills Subdivi serves 448 retail connections and about 1,344 people. Because it reports fewer than 3,300 connections, it is on a five-year water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

24.8% non-revenue water in FY2020, higher than 69% of the 1,775 Texas systems that filed that year.

Water balance, FY2020 · 62.2 MG system input
Billed 46.8 MG Unbilled authorized 0.78 MG Apparent loss 1.11 MG Real loss 13.6 MG

Components sum to within 0.00% of reported system input, inside the 0.5% tolerance.

Filed history, 2020–2020
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2020 24.8% 62.2 $16,973 closed

How to read the recoverable figure

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed — under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued at the retail rate, because recovering it is revenue, and it is recoverable inside a budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only: eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water, not what it would have sold for. Adding those two at the same rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes.

As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.

Comparable systems

Same county, or the same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Kipling Oaks 1MONTGOMERY County 19.1%
Montgomery County MUD 24 Country ColonyMONTGOMERY County 5.9%
Pinehurst Decker Prairie Water Supply CorpMONTGOMERY County 5.0%
Woodbranch VillageMONTGOMERY County 7.6%
Kipling Oaks And TimbergreenMONTGOMERY County 7.8%
Decker OaksMONTGOMERY County 9.4%
White Oak Water Supply CorporationMONTGOMERY County 10.4%
Conroe ResortMONTGOMERY County 17.5%

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $16,973 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Towering Oaks And Rosewood Hills Subdivi

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.