Texas · PWS TX1700025 · MONTGOMERY County

Oak Ridge North

What Oak Ridge North filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2015–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
38.7%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
Recoverable annually
$14.1M
As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.
Balance check
closed
The filed water balance closes.

Read this page as markdown →

What the filing says

Oak Ridge North serves 1,182 retail connections and about 3,600 people. Because it reports fewer than 3,300 connections, it is on a five-year water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

38.7% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 87% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year.

The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 11.8 points a year, against a Texas median of 5.79, including 14.0% to 41.0% between FY2017 and FY2020. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.
Water balance, FY2024 · 142.3 MG system input
Billed 87.2 MG Unbilled authorized 30.2 MG Apparent loss 3.13 MG Real loss 21.7 MG

Components sum to within 0.00% of reported system input, inside the 0.5% tolerance.

Filed history, 2015–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2024 38.7% 142.3 $14.1M closed
2021 30.1% 125.1 $21,071 closed
2020 41.0% 126.2 $24,018 closed
2017 14.0% 149.8 $36,489 closed
2015 13.5% 154.7 $23,157 closed

How to read the recoverable figure

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed — under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued at the retail rate, because recovering it is revenue, and it is recoverable inside a budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only: eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water, not what it would have sold for. Adding those two at the same rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes.

As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.

Comparable systems

Same county, or the same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Panorama VillageMONTGOMERY County 18.2%
Montgomery County WCID 1MONTGOMERY County 13.4%
Montgomery County UD 2MONTGOMERY County 5.0%
Montgomery County MUD 95MONTGOMERY County 2.1%
Point Aquarius MUDMONTGOMERY County 10.7%
Montgomery County MUD 105MONTGOMERY County 20.1%
Woodland Oaks SubMONTGOMERY County 13.0%
Montgomery County MUD 88MONTGOMERY County 2.6%

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $14.1M a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Oak Ridge North

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.