Texas · PWS TX2470001 · WILSON County

Floresville

What Floresville filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2015–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
26.4%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
Recoverable annually
$5.44M
As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.
Balance check
closed
The filed water balance closes.

What the filing says

Floresville serves 3,094 retail connections and about 8,061 people. Because it reports fewer than 3,300 connections, it is on a five-year water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

26.4% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 69% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year.

The reported figure is stable, moving 4.97 points a year against a Texas median of 5.81, so the level is more likely to reflect the system than the paperwork.

Water balance, FY2024 · 457.3 MG system input
Billed 336.5 MG Unbilled authorized 2.7 MG Apparent loss 5.08 MG Real loss 113 MG

Components sum to within 0.00% of reported system input, inside the 0.5% tolerance.

Filed history, 2015–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2024 26.4% 457.3 $5.44M closed
2023 17.7% 447.6 $315,103 closed
2021 21.1% 364.1 $226,209 closed
2020 25.9% 425.1 $285,873 closed
2019 22.0% 384 $53,527 closed
2016 30.5% 386.4 $82,279 closed
2015 31.0% 405.5 $85,777 closed

How to read the recoverable figure

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed — under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued at the retail rate, because recovering it is revenue, and it is recoverable inside a budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only: eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water, not what it would have sold for. Adding those two at the same rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes.

As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.

Comparable systems

Same county, or the same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Oak Hills Water Supply CorpWILSON County 7.8%
Sunko Water Supply CorpWILSON County 14.6%
Picosa Water Supply CorpWILSON County 19.0%
La VerniaWILSON County 30.4%
StockdaleWILSON County 27.3%
Three Oaks Water Supply CorpWILSON County 37.6%
Lake ValleyWILSON County 9.0%
Creekwood EstatesWILSON County 8.9%

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $5.44M a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Floresville

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.