Texas · PWS TX0420001 · COLEMAN County

Coleman

What Coleman filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2015–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2023
16.6%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
Recoverable annually
$99,627
As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.
Balance check
closed
The filed water balance closes.

Read this page as markdown →

What the filing says

Coleman serves 2,799 retail connections and about 3,998 people. Because it reports fewer than 3,300 connections, it is on a five-year water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

16.6% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 51% of the 785 Texas systems that filed that year.

The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 15.7 points a year, against a Texas median of 5.79, including 22.4% to 53.2% between FY2018 and FY2019. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.
Water balance, FY2023 · 187.7 MG system input
Billed 156.6 MG Unbilled authorized 0.39 MG Apparent loss 18.2 MG Real loss 12.5 MG

Components sum to within 0.00% of reported system input, inside the 0.5% tolerance.

Filed history, 2015–2023
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2023 16.6% 187.7 $99,627 closed
2022 39.5% 258.9 $234,684 closed
2020 44.5% 247.1 $198,273 closed
2019 53.2% 280.3 $88,764 closed
2018 22.4% 183.2 $35,062 closed
2017 37.0% 216.7 $41,402 closed
2016 51.3% 282.1 $273,880 closed
2015 37.4% 214.5 $155,891 closed

How to read the recoverable figure

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed — under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued at the retail rate, because recovering it is revenue, and it is recoverable inside a budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only: eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water, not what it would have sold for. Adding those two at the same rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes.

As computed in the filed audit itself: apparent loss valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate.

Comparable systems

Same county, or the same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Santa AnnaCOLEMAN County 22.2%
Southwest Fannin County SUD1,000–3,300 connections 29.0%
Jackrabbit Road PUD1,000–3,300 connections 8.8%
Mason Creek Utility District1,000–3,300 connections 13.5%
Kingsbridge MUD1,000–3,300 connections 10.9%
Macedonia Eylau MUD 11,000–3,300 connections 10.1%
Nassau Bay1,000–3,300 connections 17.0%
La Grange1,000–3,300 connections 11.0%

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $99,627 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Coleman

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.