Indiana · PWS IN0000000

South Coast Conservancy District

What South Coast Conservancy District filed with IFA about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2019 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2019
1.7%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-4246fd01ef55.xlsxSheet3 G340

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 11.7 sheet Sheet3, cell G340 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • billed authorized consumption 11.5 sheet Sheet3, cell H340 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-4246fd01ef55.xlsx (SHA-256 4246fd01ef55aa47), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$2,290
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — IFA publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-08-4246fd01ef55.xlsxSheet3 Y340

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 2,285 sheet Sheet3, cell Y340

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-4246fd01ef55.xlsx (SHA-256 4246fd01ef55aa47), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

1.7% non-revenue water in FY2019, higher than 1% of the 455 Indiana systems that filed that year.

1.7% non-revenue water in FY2019, against 455 Indiana filings for the same yearA strip of 455 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 21.7%. This system is 1.7%. 6 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 1.7%Indiana median 21.7%

Compliance record

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System carries no violation for this system in the 2026Q2 download.

That is a statement about the record. SDWIS is a state-to-EPA reporting pipeline and its completeness varies by primacy agency and by quarter, so an empty record is not the same as a system that has never been in violation.

Water balance, FY2019 · 11.7 MG system input
Billed 11.5 MG Unbilled authorized 0.1 MG Apparent loss 0.06 MG Real loss 0.04 MG

IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 11.7 MG sheet Sheet3, cell G340 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • Billed authorized 11.5 MG sheet Sheet3, cell H340 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.1 MG sheet Sheet3, cell J340 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 0.06 MG sheet Sheet3, cell N340
  • Real loss 0.04 MG sheet Sheet3, cell O340

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-4246fd01ef55.xlsx (SHA-256 4246fd01ef55aa47), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2019
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2019 1.7% 11.7 $2,290

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Salt Creek Servicesunder 1,000 connections 42.3% FY2023
Sisters Of Providence/st. Mary Of Woodsunder 1,000 connections 38.9% FY2023
Citizens Water - Westfield|southern Madisonunder 1,000 connections 9.1% FY2023
Fawn River Crossingunder 1,000 connections 15.4% FY2023
Hickory Lakeunder 1,000 connections 2.4% FY2023
South Coastunder 1,000 connections 2.4% FY2023
Philadelphia Waterworks - Ninestar Connectunder 1,000 connections 55.8% FY2021
Fort Wayne City Utilities - Honeysuckleunder 1,000 connections 33.4% FY2021

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $2,290 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about South Coast Conservancy District

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “South Coast Conservancy District — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/south-coast-conservancy-district/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.