Indiana · PWS IN5263002

Petersburg Water

What Petersburg Water filed with IFA about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2023
70.5%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsxSheet1 H339

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 139.6 sheet Sheet1, cell H339 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • billed authorized consumption 41.2 sheet Sheet1, cell I339 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsx (SHA-256 c8960b5d1f332b53), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what IFA publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
inapplicable
IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

70.5% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 99% of the 430 Indiana systems that filed that year.

70.5% non-revenue water in FY2023, against 430 Indiana filings for the same yearA strip of 430 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 22.6%. This system is 70.5%. 6 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 70.5%Indiana median 22.6%

Compliance record

7 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 6 resolved, 1 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2023 · 139.6 MG system input
Billed 41.2 MG Unbilled authorized 2.31 MG Apparent loss 1.04 MG Real loss 95.1 MG

IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 139.6 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H339 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • Billed authorized 41.2 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I339 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 2.31 MG sheet Sheet1, cell K339 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 1.04 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O339
  • Real loss 95.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell P339

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsx (SHA-256 c8960b5d1f332b53), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2023
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2023 70.5% 139.6
2021 54.1% 211.4 $16,700
2019 57.4% 199.6 $30,400

Comparable systems

The same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Hebron, Town Of1,000–3,300 connections 8.2% FY2023
East Fork Water, Inc.1,000–3,300 connections 30.8% FY2023
Rockville1,000–3,300 connections 26.1% FY2021
Fowler, Town Of1,000–3,300 connections 18.2% FY2023
Lawrenceburg Municipal1,000–3,300 connections 8.6% FY2019
Jasonville1,000–3,300 connections 43.3% FY2023
Ossian, Town Of1,000–3,300 connections 17.8% FY2023
Attica, City Of1,000–3,300 connections 54.3% FY2023

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Petersburg Water

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Petersburg Water — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/petersburg-water/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.