Georgia · PWS GA0510107 · CHATHAM County

Usa-hunter Army Airfield Main

What Usa-hunter Army Airfield Main filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
30.2%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H226

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 124.5 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H226 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 86.9 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I226 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what EPD publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

30.2% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 60% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

30.2% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.2%. This system is 30.2%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 30.2%Georgia median 26.2%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 26.9 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 100% to 28% between FY2018 and FY2019. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

7 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 2 resolved, 5 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • FY2021 reports a leakage index of 0.09417023467222534, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 124.5 MG system input
Billed 86.9 MG Unbilled authorized 0.22 MG Apparent loss 0.43 MG Real loss 36.9 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 124.5 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H226 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 86.9 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I226 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.22 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K226 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 0.43 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O226
  • Real loss 36.9 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P226

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 30.2% 124.5 inapplicable
2024 41.5% 146.7 $246 insufficient
2023 99.5% 144.2 inapplicable
2022 51.0% 154.9 inapplicable
2021 42.5% 154 $7,050 inapplicable
2020 51.5% 151.6 $2,950 inapplicable
2019 28.1% 131.7 $3,410 inapplicable
2018 99.9% 128.4 $387 inapplicable
2017 42.5% 133.1 $551 inapplicable
2016 52.0% 162.6 $640 inapplicable
2015 48.3% 163.1 $1,910 inapplicable
2014 54.2% 193.9 $2,120 inapplicable
2013 38.2% 698.1 $1,210 inapplicable
2012 64.6% 293.4 $3,240 inapplicable

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Savannah - Savannah QtrsCHATHAM County 21.4% FY2025
Savannah - Dutch IslandCHATHAM County 13.8% FY2023
Savannah - WhitemarshCHATHAM County 27.4% FY2025
Glen Of Robin HoodCHATHAM County 24.2% FY2024
Tybee IslandCHATHAM County 12.4% FY2025
Garden CityCHATHAM County 20.5% FY2025
Port WentworthCHATHAM County 32.3% FY2025
The Landings Subdivision - Utilities, Inc.CHATHAM County 8.1% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Usa-hunter Army Airfield Main

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Usa-hunter Army Airfield Main — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/usa-hunter-army-airfield-main/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.