Georgia · PWS GA2930010 · UPSON County

Upson County

What Upson County filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
20.9%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H221

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 164.4 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H221 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 130.1 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I221 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$52,400
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z221

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 52,411 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z221

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

20.9% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 36% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

20.9% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 20.9%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 20.9%Georgia median 26.4%

Compliance record

18 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 12 resolved, 6 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2025 · 164.4 MG system input
Billed 130.1 MG Unbilled authorized 0.8 MG Apparent loss 4.69 MG Real loss 28.8 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 164.4 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H221 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 130.1 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I221 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.8 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K221 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 4.69 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O221
  • Real loss 28.8 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P221

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 20.9% 164.4 $52,400 inapplicable
2024 23.9% 174 $53,800 inapplicable
2023 21.2% 162.3 $45,800 inapplicable
2022 10.9% 172.2 $57,400 inapplicable
2021 14.3% 158.9 $46,800 inapplicable
2020 15.6% 149.8 $40,300 inapplicable
2019 17.1% 150.7 $28,400 inapplicable
2018 25.8% 155.3 $31,400 inapplicable
2017 1.2% 125.5 $20,200 insufficient
2016 7.4% 136.3 $8,710 inapplicable
2015 10.4% 134.2 $17,800 inapplicable
2014 24.7% 181.7 $20,200 inapplicable
2013 28.6% 169.2 $13,200 inapplicable
2012 28.9% 178.6 $17,300 inapplicable

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
ThomastonUPSON County 30.1% FY2025
Franklin County1,000–3,300 connections 12.1% FY2020
Blackshear1,000–3,300 connections 6.3% FY2025
Palmetto1,000–3,300 connections 26.6% FY2025
Statham1,000–3,300 connections 24.3% FY2025
Social Circle1,000–3,300 connections 30.2% FY2025
Manchester1,000–3,300 connections 66.8% FY2025
Gray1,000–3,300 connections 23.6% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $52,400 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Upson County

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Upson County — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/upson-county-water-department/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.