Georgia · PWS GA1210010 · FULTON County

Union City

What Union City filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
24.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H220

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 578.3 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H220 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 437.9 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I220 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$96,100
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z220

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 96,140 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z220

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

24.3% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 44% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

24.3% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 24.3%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 24.3%Georgia median 26.4%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 13.6 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 6% to 58% between FY2020 and FY2021. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

24 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 13 are health-based. 21 resolved, 3 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • The FY2019 volumes are not published here because the filing contradicts itself — billed authorized consumption 543.3 MG exceeds this filing's own system input 501.0 MG.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 578.3 MG system input
Billed 437.9 MG Unbilled authorized 21.4 MG Apparent loss 8.18 MG Real loss 110.8 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 578.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H220 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 437.9 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I220 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 21.4 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K220 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 8.18 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O220
  • Real loss 110.8 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P220

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2011–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 24.3% 578.3 $96,100 inapplicable
2024 19.1% 575.9 $171,000 inapplicable
2023 21.5% 575.2 $271,000 inapplicable
2022 19.8% 582.5 $127,000 inapplicable
2021 58.2% 563.2 $84,800 inapplicable
2020 6.1% 549.3 $116,000 inapplicable
2019 n/a insufficient
2018 10.3% 516.1 insufficient
2017 12.6% 491.4 insufficient
2016 19.6% 491.4 $100,000 inapplicable
2015 41.7% 436.4 insufficient
2014 13.5% 459 $106,000 inapplicable
2013 22.9% 511.3 $92,600 inapplicable
2012 19.1% 535 $98,900 inapplicable
2011 16.8% 541.4 $85,800 inapplicable

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
FairburnFULTON County 7.9% FY2025
RoswellFULTON County 23.6% FY2025
College ParkFULTON County 25.1% FY2025
HapevilleFULTON County 10.0% FY2025
PalmettoFULTON County 26.6% FY2025
East PointFULTON County 3.5% FY2025
North Fulton CountyFULTON County 2.4% FY2025
AtlantaFULTON County 36.5% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $96,100 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Union City

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Union City — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/union-city/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.