Georgia · PWS GA1070005 · EMANUEL County

Swainsboro

What Swainsboro filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2019 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2019
3.0%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx2019 Water Audits H203

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 454.5 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell H203 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 441.1 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell I203 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx (SHA-256 d59e6092c82b28b2), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$22,300
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx2019 Water Audits Y203

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 22,271 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell Y203

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx (SHA-256 d59e6092c82b28b2), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

3.0% non-revenue water in FY2019, higher than 1% of the 232 Georgia systems that filed that year.

3.0% non-revenue water in FY2019, against 232 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 232 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.4%. This system is 3.0%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 3.0%Georgia median 25.4%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 14.9 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 38% to 5% between FY2016 and FY2017. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

43 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 2 are health-based. 27 resolved, 16 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2019 · 454.5 MG system input
Billed 441.1 MG Unbilled authorized 5.68 MG Apparent loss 3.09 MG Real loss 4.68 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 454.5 MG sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell H203 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 441.1 MG sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell I203 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 5.68 MG sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell K203 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 3.09 MG sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell O203
  • Real loss 4.68 MG sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell P203

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx (SHA-256 d59e6092c82b28b2), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2019
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2019 3.0% 454.5 $22,300
2018 18.2% 400.6 $12,700
2017 5.2% 384.5 $7,640
2016 38.4% 417.7 $24,200
2015 11.0% 406 $28,400
2014 14.0% 405.8 $13,600
2013 20.7% 384.4 $18,300
2012 26.2% 447 $20,800

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
SwainsboroEMANUEL County 58.7% FY2025
Clayton3,300–10,000 connections 58.4% FY2022
Garden City3,300–10,000 connections 20.5% FY2025
Blue Ridge3,300–10,000 connections 24.6% FY2025
Forsyth3,300–10,000 connections 11.5% FY2025
Byron3,300–10,000 connections 34.3% FY2025
Eastman3,300–10,000 connections 39.3% FY2025
Utilities, Inc. (big Canoe Subdivision)3,300–10,000 connections 46.5% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $22,300 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Swainsboro

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Swainsboro — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/swainsboro-emanuel-county/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.