Georgia · PWS GA2670002 · TATTNALL County

Glennville

What Glennville filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2020 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2020
13.8%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version H100

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 258.6 sheet Final Version, cell H100 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 223.1 sheet Final Version, cell I100 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$9,450
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version Y100

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 9,454 sheet Final Version, cell Y100

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

13.8% non-revenue water in FY2020, higher than 20% of the 230 Georgia systems that filed that year.

13.8% non-revenue water in FY2020, against 230 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 230 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.3%. This system is 13.8%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 13.8%Georgia median 25.3%

Compliance record

12 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 4 are health-based. 4 resolved, 8 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

What is missing from this record, and why

EPD published 5 filings for Glennville that this page does not show: FY2021–FY2025. Glennville did file, and the filing is in EPD's published results.

It is absent here because its published identifier belongs to a system in another county, filed as GA2670002, CG2670002. Publishing it under that identifier would attribute this utility's water balance to a different named system, and deciding which system a contradicting filing belongs to is not a decision this pipeline is allowed to make. Read the gap as ours, not as a utility that stopped reporting.

Water balance, FY2020 · 258.6 MG system input
Billed 223.1 MG Unbilled authorized 10.9 MG Apparent loss 2.36 MG Real loss 22.3 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 258.6 MG sheet Final Version, cell H100 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 223.1 MG sheet Final Version, cell I100 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 10.9 MG sheet Final Version, cell K100 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 2.36 MG sheet Final Version, cell O100
  • Real loss 22.3 MG sheet Final Version, cell P100

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2020
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2020 13.8% 258.6 $9,450
2019 15.0% 260.2 $7,800
2018 13.2% 245.5 $8,920
2017 10.1% 227.9 $8,110
2016 18.6% 250.3 $8,190
2015 24.6% 275.7 $66,100
2014 27.4% 277.5 $21,700
2013 26.1% 266.5 $19,500
2012 21.0% 274.2 $38,400

Comparable systems

The same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Cave Spring1,000–3,300 connections 65.0% FY2025
Nashville1,000–3,300 connections 15.1% FY2025
Hahira1,000–3,300 connections 19.3% FY2025
Cochran1,000–3,300 connections 42.9% FY2025
Gray1,000–3,300 connections 23.6% FY2025
Blairsville1,000–3,300 connections 44.0% FY2025
Millen1,000–3,300 connections 9.3% FY2025
Dawsonville1,000–3,300 connections 16.7% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $9,450 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Glennville

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Glennville — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/glennville/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.