Georgia · PWS GA0970000 · DOUGLAS County

Douglasville-douglas County Wsa

What Douglasville-douglas County Wsa filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
16.1%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H74

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 5,057 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H74 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 4,243 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I74 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$951,000
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z74

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 950,555 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z74

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

16.1% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 25% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

16.1% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 16.1%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 16.1%Georgia median 26.4%

Compliance record

3 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 2 resolved, 1 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2025 · 5,057 MG system input
Billed 4,243 MG Unbilled authorized 33.6 MG Apparent loss 137.3 MG Real loss 643.6 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 5,057 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H74 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 4,243 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I74 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 33.6 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K74 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 137.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O74
  • Real loss 643.6 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P74

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2011–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 16.1% 5,057 $951,000
2024 15.0% 4,867 $561,000
2023 16.1% 4,692 $552,000
2022 15.6% 4,537 $495,000
2021 12.8% 4,252 $421,000
2020 13.8% 4,226 $420,000
2019 15.3% 4,259 $472,000
2018 14.0% 4,038 $473,000
2017 13.9% 4,027 $373,000
2016 13.8% 4,059 $524,000
2015 14.9% 3,867 $722,000
2014 16.1% 3,833 $755,000
2013 17.2% 3,669 $891,000
2012 16.1% 3,884 $857,000
2011 18.2% 3,981 $511,000

Comparable systems

The same size band — 10,000–50,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Athens-clarke County Public10,000–50,000 connections 12.6% FY2025
Dalton10,000–50,000 connections 38.7% FY2025
Coweta County Water & Sewerage10,000–50,000 connections 16.2% FY2025
Albany10,000–50,000 connections 23.0% FY2025
Fayette County10,000–50,000 connections 7.0% FY2025
Rockdale Water Resources10,000–50,000 connections 30.2% FY2025
Warner Robins10,000–50,000 connections 32.4% FY2025
Newton County Water & Sewerage10,000–50,000 connections 4.4% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $951,000 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Douglasville-douglas County Wsa

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Douglasville-douglas County Wsa — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/douglasville-douglas-county-wsa/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.