Georgia · PWS GA0550000 · CHATTOOGA County

Chattooga County Water District 1

What Chattooga County Water District 1 filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2020 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2020
27.5%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version H46

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 346.8 sheet Final Version, cell H46 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 251.3 sheet Final Version, cell I46 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$77,400
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version Y46

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 77,449 sheet Final Version, cell Y46

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

27.5% non-revenue water in FY2020, higher than 60% of the 230 Georgia systems that filed that year.

27.5% non-revenue water in FY2020, against 230 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 230 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.2%. This system is 27.5%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 27.5%Georgia median 25.2%

Compliance record

8 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 5 resolved, 2 archived, and 1 still open.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

What is missing from this record, and why

EPD published 2 filings for Chattooga County Water District 1 that this page does not show: FY2021–FY2022. Chattooga County Water District 1 did file, and the filing is in EPD's published results.

It is absent here because its published identifier belongs to a system in another county, filed as GA0550000. Publishing it under that identifier would attribute this utility's water balance to a different named system, and deciding which system a contradicting filing belongs to is not a decision this pipeline is allowed to make. Read the gap as ours, not as a utility that stopped reporting.

Water balance, FY2020 · 346.8 MG system input
Billed 251.3 MG Unbilled authorized 4.34 MG Apparent loss 14.7 MG Real loss 76.4 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 346.8 MG sheet Final Version, cell H46 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 251.3 MG sheet Final Version, cell I46 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 4.34 MG sheet Final Version, cell K46 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 14.7 MG sheet Final Version, cell O46
  • Real loss 76.4 MG sheet Final Version, cell P46

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2020
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2020 27.5% 346.8 $77,400
2019 44.0% 320.8 $67,300
2018 39.3% 318.6 $94,100
2017 43.2% 315.4 $65,100
2016 38.4% 305.3 $30,900
2015 39.7% 289.4 $23,200
2014 44.9% 293 $26,900
2013 42.5% 264.5 $23,800
2012 34.5% 232 $23,300

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
SummervilleCHATTOOGA County 37.5% FY2025
Tybee Island3,300–10,000 connections 12.4% FY2025
Bremen3,300–10,000 connections 26.9% FY2025
McCaysville3,300–10,000 connections 44.6% FY2025
College Park3,300–10,000 connections 25.1% FY2025
Madison3,300–10,000 connections 7.9% FY2025
Banks County3,300–10,000 connections 16.5% FY2025
Coosa3,300–10,000 connections 22.7% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $77,400 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Chattooga County Water District 1

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Chattooga County Water District 1 — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/chattooga-county-water-district-1/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.