Georgia · PWS GA2690000 · TAYLOR County

Butler

What Butler filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
37.4%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H32

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 183.1 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H32 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 114.7 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I32 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$20,600
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z32

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 20,612 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z32

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

37.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 76% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

37.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.2%. This system is 37.4%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 37.4%Georgia median 26.2%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 9.8 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 31% to 5% between FY2014 and FY2015. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

Compliance record

18 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 18 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2025 · 183.1 MG system input
Billed 114.7 MG Unbilled authorized 0.35 MG Apparent loss 1.73 MG Real loss 66.4 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 183.1 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H32 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 114.7 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I32 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.35 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K32 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 1.73 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O32
  • Real loss 66.4 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P32

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 37.4% 183.1 $20,600
2016 12.1% 176.3 $9,870
2015 5.0% 164.9 $10,000
2014 31.2% 161.7 $7,740
2013 38.1% 160.8 $5,350
2012 32.1% 172.4 $6,870

Comparable systems

The same size band — 1,000–3,300 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
South Atlantic Utilities-bryan County1,000–3,300 connections 1.3% FY2025
Homerville1,000–3,300 connections 42.4% FY2025
Glynn County - South Main Land1,000–3,300 connections 15.2% FY2025
Greensboro1,000–3,300 connections 37.3% FY2020
Cuthbert1,000–3,300 connections 61.4% FY2023
Monticello1,000–3,300 connections 23.8% FY2025
Ringgold1,000–3,300 connections 21.8% FY2025
Pelham1,000–3,300 connections 55.2% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $20,600 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Butler

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Butler — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/butler/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.