San Diego County
What San Diego County filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2018–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.
- Non-revenue water, FY2023
- 0.3% Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
- system input volume 50,551 sheet Sheet1, cell AN3515 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- billed authorized consumption 50,378 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ3515 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- Recoverable annually
- — Not estimable from what DWR publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
- Balance check
- inapplicable DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.
2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN3515
Where this figure comes from
(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100
From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.
What the record shows
0.3% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 0% of the 547 California systems that filed that year.
- The figure is roughly flat across the record.
What it charges
No bill is published for this system. This system did not state a billing frequency, so the period a charge covers is not established.
It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.
Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.
Compliance record
1 violation on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 1 resolved, and 0 still open.
Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.
Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.
Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.
Who filed this audit
San Diego County Water Authority filed this audit for FY2023 and operates no other system in the export that year. California keys its export on the filing organization and not on the system, so the two coincide here rather than by definition.
Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.
Where these volumes come from
- System input 50,551 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN3515 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- Billed authorized 50,378 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ3515 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- Unbilled authorized 12.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW3515 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- Apparent loss 2.52 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC3515 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
- Real loss 158.7 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE3515 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.
| Year | NRW | Input (MG) | Recoverable | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.3% | 50,551 | — | inapplicable |
| 2021 | 0.1% | 60,699 | -$288,000 | insufficient |
| 2019 | 0.1% | 54,628 | $751,000 | insufficient |
| 2018 | 0.2% | 63,968 | $892,000 | insufficient |
Comparable systems
The same size band — under 1,000 connections.
| System | Basis for comparison | NRW |
|---|---|---|
| Placer County Water Agency Applegate | under 1,000 connections | 12.6% FY2024 |
| Gswc - Desert View | under 1,000 connections | 19.6% FY2024 |
| Saticoy Country Club - City Of Ventura | under 1,000 connections | 2.5% FY2024 |
| Sacramento County Water Agency - Metro Air Park | under 1,000 connections | 29.5% FY2024 |
| Cws Rdv Rancho Del Paradiso | under 1,000 connections | 12.6% FY2024 |
| Amador Water Agency - Lamel | under 1,000 connections | 4.5% FY2024 |
| Gswc - Sisquoc | under 1,000 connections | 14.9% FY2024 |
| Tuolumne Utilites District - Phoenix Lake | under 1,000 connections | 7.3% FY2023 |
Where is it going?
This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.
Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.
See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about San Diego CountySources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.
- California DWR — urban retail water supplier water loss audits, filed under Water Code section 10608.34. Retrieved 2026-09-05 from data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/d6cdd89e-49b0-4b1f-86ee-8b7237e5f169/resource/058ac6ca-a8b4-4f28-b6c8-11e48309f3b4/download/ca-retailer-waterlossdata.csv