California · PWS CA3610120

Pphcsd

What Pphcsd filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2017–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
13.6%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN3306

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 911.7 sheet Sheet1, cell AN3306 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 788 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ3306 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$46,900
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH3306

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 46,904 sheet Sheet1, cell DH3306

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

13.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 79% of the 141 California systems that filed that year.

13.6% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 141 California filings for the same yearA strip of 141 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 6.9%. This system is 13.6%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 13.6%California median 6.9%

What it charges

$92.49 a month for a household using 6 hundred cubic feet — 4,488 gallons — and $188.11 at 17,952 gallons. Computed from the fixed charge and the tiers this system filed for reporting year 2025, not read off a rate sheet.

The fixed charge is $66.51 a month before any water is used. Billing is monthly, quoted in hundred cubic feet.

Where this figure comes from

fixed charge + each tier's price over the part of 6 HCF that falls in it

  • Fixed charge WRSFCostPerUOM1, system CA3610120
  • Volumetric tiers WRSFUsageCost1, WRSFUsageCost2, system CA3610120
  • Tier tops WRSFMetricUsage1, WRSFMetricUsage2, system CA3610120
  • Unit of measure WRUOM, system CA3610120
  • Billing frequency WRFrequency, system CA3610120
  • The Board's own charge field WR6HCFDWCharges, system CA3610120

From data/archive/ca-ear-rates/2026-09-09-6eba0fd85f1f-section8-charges.jsonl, extracted 2026-09-09 from the Board's published section 8a file. That file has no cells: a value is found by the system identifier and the question abbreviation above.

The Board also publishes an undocumented charge field for this volume. Our figure reproduces it to the cent, which is what establishes that the field is a bill at this volume for systems like this one.

This is what the system reported for reporting year 2025. It is not necessarily the rate in force today, and nothing in the filing says whether it has since changed.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System carries no violation for this system in the 2026Q2 download.

That is a statement about the record. SDWIS is a state-to-EPA reporting pipeline and its completeness varies by primacy agency and by quarter, so an empty record is not the same as a system that has never been in violation.

Who filed this audit

Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District filed this audit for FY2025 and operates no other system in the export that year. California keys its export on the filing organization and not on the system, so the two coincide here rather than by definition.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2025 · 911.7 MG system input
Billed 788 MG Unbilled authorized 3.19 MG Apparent loss 7.91 MG Real loss 112.6 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 911.7 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN3306 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 788 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ3306 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 3.19 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW3306 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 7.91 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC3306 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 112.6 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE3306 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2017–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 13.6% 911.7 $46,900
2024 11.8% 833.6 $38,000
2023 15.3% 867.3 $36,600
2022 13.0% 984.1 $38,100
2021 14.5% 1,035 $29,900
2020 15.2% 896.6 $18,600
2019 14.2% 862.8 $16,800
2018 13.6% 893.5 $16,900
2017 12.8% 851.9 $27,700

Comparable systems

The same size band — 3,300–10,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Patterson, City Of3,300–10,000 connections 10.9% FY2024
Twentynine Palms Water District3,300–10,000 connections 6.7% FY2024
Mountain House3,300–10,000 connections 17.6% FY2024
Bellflower Somerset Mutual Water Co3,300–10,000 connections 3.1% FY2024
Riverbank3,300–10,000 connections 17.4% FY2024
West Kern Water District3,300–10,000 connections 4.6% FY2025
Paramount3,300–10,000 connections 3.1% FY2025
Lac Wwd No. 40 - Regions 24/27/33/35/38/393,300–10,000 connections 8.2% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $46,900 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Pphcsd

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Pphcsd — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/pphcsd/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.