California · PWS CA5010035

Modesto - C Turlock

What Modesto - C Turlock filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2017–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
1.2%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN4507

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 5.1 sheet Sheet1, cell AN4507 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 5.04 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ4507 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$539
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH4507

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 539.3 sheet Sheet1, cell DH4507

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
insufficient
The filing does not publish enough components to decompose system input.

What the record shows

1.2% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 2% of the 141 California systems that filed that year.

1.2% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 141 California filings for the same yearA strip of 141 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 6.9%. This system is 1.2%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 1.2%California median 6.9%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 11.9 points a year, against a California median of 2.6, including 67% to 26% between FY2017 and FY2018. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

What it charges

$55.89 a month for a household using 6 hundred cubic feet — 4,488 gallons — and $97.29 at 17,952 gallons. Computed from the fixed charge and the tiers this system filed for reporting year 2025, not read off a rate sheet.

The fixed charge is $42.09 a month before any water is used. Billing is monthly, quoted in hundred cubic feet.

Where this figure comes from

fixed charge + each tier's price over the part of 6 HCF that falls in it

  • Fixed charge WRSFCostPerUOM1, system CA5010035
  • Volumetric tiers WRSFUsageCost1, system CA5010035
  • Tier tops WRSFMetricUsage1, system CA5010035
  • Unit of measure WRUOM, system CA5010035
  • Billing frequency WRFrequency, system CA5010035
  • The Board's own charge field WR6HCFDWCharges, system CA5010035

From data/archive/ca-ear-rates/2026-09-09-6eba0fd85f1f-section8-charges.jsonl, extracted 2026-09-09 from the Board's published section 8a file. That file has no cells: a value is found by the system identifier and the question abbreviation above.

The Board also publishes an undocumented charge field for this volume. Our figure reproduces it to the cent, which is what establishes that the field is a bill at this volume for systems like this one.

This is what the system reported for reporting year 2025. It is not necessarily the rate in force today, and nothing in the filing says whether it has since changed.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

5 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 3 are health-based. 5 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • FY2024 reports a leakage index of 0.0448442881607012, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Who filed this audit

Modesto City Of filed 7 separate audits for FY2025, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. Modesto City Of made one set of decisions and filed it 7 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2025

This filing reports totals but not the components a balance is made of, so the identity input = billed + unbilled authorized + apparent loss + real loss has nothing to be tested against. Absent: real loss.

insufficient · not checkable

This is recorded as unverifiable and not reported as a pass. The difference is the one between a disclosure gap and a clean bill of health.

Filed history, 2017–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 1.2% 5.1 $539 insufficient
2024 1.9% 4.77 $507 inapplicable
2023 17.7% 5.09 $287 inapplicable
2022 22.2% 6.33 $872 inapplicable
2021 13.3% 6.03 $878 inapplicable
2020 10.4% 6.02 $709 inapplicable
2019 7.6% 5.71 $794 inapplicable
2018 26.0% 6.71 $750 inapplicable
2017 67.4% 6.8 $1,160 inapplicable

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
California - American Water Company - Sacramento District - Security Parkunder 1,000 connections 14.9% FY2024
Sacramento County Water Agency - Southwest Tractunder 1,000 connections 13.3% FY2024
Tuolumne Utilites Districtunder 1,000 connections 22.8% FY2024
Wmwd - Rainbowunder 1,000 connections 35.7% FY2024
Sacramento County Water Agencyunder 1,000 connections 6.9% FY2019
Placer County Water Agency Bianchiunder 1,000 connections 4.2% FY2024
Nid Smartsvilleunder 1,000 connections 23.4% FY2024
California - American Water Company - Monterey District - Ralph Laneunder 1,000 connections 4.8% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $539 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Modesto - C Turlock

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Modesto - C Turlock — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/modesto-c-turlock/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.