California · PWS CA3310080

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District

What Lake Hemet Municipal Water District filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2018–2020 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2020
100.0%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN2666

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 15.7 sheet Sheet1, cell AN2666 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 0 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ2666 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what DWR publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
insufficient
The filing does not publish enough components to decompose system input.

What the record shows

100.0% non-revenue water in FY2020, higher than 100% of the 554 California systems that filed that year.

100.0% non-revenue water in FY2020, against 554 California filings for the same yearA strip of 554 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 100.0%. 5 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 100.0%California median 9.2%

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. This system did not state a billing frequency, so the period a charge covers is not established.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

1 violation on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 1 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District filed 2 separate audits for FY2020, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. Lake Hemet Municipal Water District made one set of decisions and filed it 2 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2020

This filing reports totals but not the components a balance is made of, so the identity input = billed + unbilled authorized + apparent loss + real loss has nothing to be tested against. Absent: real loss.

insufficient · not checkable

This is recorded as unverifiable and not reported as a pass. The difference is the one between a disclosure gap and a clean bill of health.

Filed history, 2018–2020
Year NRW Input (MG) Balance
2020 100.0% 15.7 insufficient
2019 12.6 insufficient
2018 100.0% 17.5 inapplicable

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Big Bear Lake Department Ofunder 1,000 connections 0.0% FY2025
Amador Water Agency - Pg&eunder 1,000 connections 0.7% FY2024
Port Hueneme Water Agencyunder 1,000 connections 0.8% FY2023
Lompocunder 1,000 connections 71.7% FY2025
Placer County Water Agency Monte Vistaunder 1,000 connections 0.8% FY2024
Tuolumne Utilites District - Wards Ferryunder 1,000 connections 4.7% FY2024
Gswc - South Shoreunder 1,000 connections 40.0% FY2024
South Feather Water & Power Agency - Btpunder 1,000 connections 11.5% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Lake Hemet Municipal Water District

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Lake Hemet Municipal Water District — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/lake-hemet-municipal-water-district-ca3310080/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.