California · PWS CA1010018

Kerman

What Kerman filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
12.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN411

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,010 sheet Sheet1, cell AN411 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 885.9 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ411 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$45,900
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH411

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 45,886 sheet Sheet1, cell DH411

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

12.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 64% of the 545 California systems that filed that year.

12.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 545 California filings for the same yearA strip of 545 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 12.3%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 12.3%California median 9.2%

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. Our computation from this system's filed rate structure and the Board's own undocumented charge field for the same volume disagree, and the field carries no definition to settle which is right.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

10 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 4 are health-based. 10 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

Kerman City Of filed this audit for FY2024 and operates no other system in the export that year. California keys its export on the filing organization and not on the system, so the two coincide here rather than by definition.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2024 · 1,010 MG system input
Billed 885.9 MG Unbilled authorized 74.8 MG Apparent loss 13.4 MG Real loss 35.5 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,010 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN411 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 885.9 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ411 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 74.8 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW411 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 13.4 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC411 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 35.5 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE411 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2024 12.3% 1,010 $45,900
2023 14.8% 956.6 $42,200
2022 14.9% 1,016 $40,600
2021 7.7% 958.3 $15,400
2020 15.8% 1,010 $34,800
2019 17.6% 944.1 $20,100
2018 17.2% 950.6 $19,900
2017 13.8% 929.3 $13,900
2016 10.8% 882.9 $7,060

Comparable systems

The same size band — 3,300–10,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
East Palo Alto3,300–10,000 connections 14.7% FY2025
Coalinga3,300–10,000 connections 20.8% FY2025
Dixon Public3,300–10,000 connections 12.5% FY2024
Cambria Community Services District3,300–10,000 connections 22.5% FY2024
Scv Water - Newhall3,300–10,000 connections 7.6% FY2024
Montebello Land & Water Company3,300–10,000 connections 10.9% FY2025
San Bernardino Csa 643,300–10,000 connections 11.3% FY2024
Greenfield3,300–10,000 connections 1.7% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $45,900 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Kerman

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Kerman — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/kerman/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.