California · PWS CA0910001

El Dorado Irrigation District - Main

What El Dorado Irrigation District - Main filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
16.2%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN326

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 9,954 sheet Sheet1, cell AN326 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 8,345 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ326 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$3.0M
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH326

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 3,043,648 sheet Sheet1, cell DH326

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

16.2% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 76% of the 545 California systems that filed that year.

16.2% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 545 California filings for the same yearA strip of 545 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 16.2%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 16.2%California median 9.2%

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. This system does not bill monthly, and a bill is per billing period — a bi-monthly fixed charge is not half a monthly one, and nothing filed says how its tiers apply to a month.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

4 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 3 are health-based. 4 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

El Dorado Irrigation District filed 3 separate audits for FY2024, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. El Dorado Irrigation District made one set of decisions and filed it 3 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2024 · 9,954 MG system input
Billed 8,345 MG Unbilled authorized 389.7 MG Apparent loss 531 MG Real loss 688.1 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 9,954 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN326 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 8,345 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ326 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 389.7 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW326 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 531 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC326 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 688.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE326 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2024 16.2% 9,954 $3.0M
2023 17.9% 9,465 $1.9M
2022 21.8% 10,256 $2.2M
2021 26.9% 11,855 $2.6M
2020 23.6% 11,253 $2.3M
2019 27.3% 10,148 $2.2M
2018 25.7% 10,925 $1.3M
2017 23.6% 10,580 $1.2M
2016 24.4% 9,819 $2.1M

Comparable systems

The same size band — 10,000–50,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Oceanside10,000–50,000 connections 5.0% FY2025
Rancho California Water District10,000–50,000 connections 6.1% FY2025
Cws Stk Stockton10,000–50,000 connections 11.5% FY2024
Corona10,000–50,000 connections 5.9% FY2025
Santa Ana10,000–50,000 connections 4.7% FY2025
Sacramento Suburban Water District10,000–50,000 connections 4.4% FY2024
Oxnard10,000–50,000 connections 7.1% FY2024
San Bernardino Municipal10,000–50,000 connections 11.5% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $3.0M a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about El Dorado Irrigation District - Main

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “El Dorado Irrigation District - Main — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/el-dorado-irrigation-district-main/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.