California · PWS CA1500407

Cws Krv Split Mountain

What Cws Krv Split Mountain filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
62.2%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN602

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 13.9 sheet Sheet1, cell AN602 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 5.24 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ602 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$4,640
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH602

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 4,644 sheet Sheet1, cell DH602

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

62.2% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 100% of the 545 California systems that filed that year.

62.2% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 545 California filings for the same yearA strip of 545 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 62.2%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 62.2%California median 9.2%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 9.1 points a year, against a California median of 2.6, including 53% to 29% between FY2020 and FY2021. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

What it charges

$90.89 a month for a household using 6 hundred cubic feet — 4,488 gallons — and $445.90 at 17,952 gallons. Computed from the fixed charge and the tiers this system filed for reporting year 2025, not read off a rate sheet.

The fixed charge is $57.89 a month before any water is used. Billing is monthly, quoted in hundred cubic feet.

Where this figure comes from

fixed charge + each tier's price over the part of 6 HCF that falls in it

  • Fixed charge WRSFCostPerUOM1, system CA1500407
  • Volumetric tiers WRSFUsageCost1, WRSFUsageCost2, system CA1500407
  • Tier tops WRSFMetricUsage1, WRSFMetricUsage2, system CA1500407
  • Unit of measure WRUOM, system CA1500407
  • Billing frequency WRFrequency, system CA1500407
  • The Board's own charge field WR6HCFDWCharges, system CA1500407

From data/archive/ca-ear-rates/2026-09-09-6eba0fd85f1f-section8-charges.jsonl, extracted 2026-09-09 from the Board's published section 8a file. That file has no cells: a value is found by the system identifier and the question abbreviation above.

The Board also publishes an undocumented charge field for this volume. Our figure reproduces it to the cent, which is what establishes that the field is a bill at this volume for systems like this one.

This is what the system reported for reporting year 2025. It is not necessarily the rate in force today, and nothing in the filing says whether it has since changed.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

11 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 4 are health-based. 7 resolved, 4 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

California Water Service Company Kern River Valley filed 7 separate audits for FY2024, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. California Water Service Company Kern River Valley made one set of decisions and filed it 7 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2024 · 13.9 MG system input
Billed 5.24 MG Unbilled authorized 0.12 MG Apparent loss 0.13 MG Real loss 8.37 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 13.9 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN602 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 5.24 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ602 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 0.12 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW602 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 0.13 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC602 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 8.37 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE602 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2024 62.2% 13.9 $4,640
2023 63.1% 13.5 $2,870
2022 42.4% 9.42 $2,990
2021 29.4% 9.2 $3,540
2020 53.2% 11.4 $2,660
2019 49.5% 9.16 $2,290
2018 55.2% 10.9 $2,480
2017 55.3% 10.2 $1,080
2016 49.9% 8.49 $1,750

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Mission Springs Water Districtunder 1,000 connections 22.0% FY2019
Gswc - Morongo Del Norteunder 1,000 connections 22.0% FY2024
Sacramento County Water Agency - East Walnut Groveunder 1,000 connections 23.7% FY2024
California - American Water Company - Sacramento District - Dunniganunder 1,000 connections 19.0% FY2024
Cws Vis Tulcounder 1,000 connections 35.3% FY2024
Blythe - Mesa Ranchunder 1,000 connections 51.7% FY2024
El Dorado Irrigation District - Outingdaleunder 1,000 connections 21.8% FY2024
Tahoe City Public Utility Districtunder 1,000 connections 33.9% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $4,640 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Cws Krv Split Mountain

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Cws Krv Split Mountain — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/cws-krv-split-mountain/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.