California · PWS CA4810001

Benicia

What Benicia filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
11.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN4189

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,178 sheet Sheet1, cell AN4189 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 1,045 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ4189 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
$134,000
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — DWR publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 DH4189

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 133,748 sheet Sheet1, cell DH4189

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

11.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 59% of the 545 California systems that filed that year.

11.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 545 California filings for the same yearA strip of 545 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 11.3%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 11.3%California median 9.2%
The reported figure is not stable enough to act on. It has moved an average of 4.5 points a year, against a California median of 2.6, including 13% to 4% between FY2018 and FY2019. A distribution system's real losses do not change that fast — pipe does not deteriorate or repair itself in a single year. A series that moves like this is describing how the water is being measured and recorded, not how much of it is being lost, and which year is closer to true cannot be settled from this filing.

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. This system does not bill monthly, and a bill is per billing period — a bi-monthly fixed charge is not half a monthly one, and nothing filed says how its tiers apply to a month.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

2 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 2 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

Benicia City Of filed this audit for FY2024 and operates no other system in the export that year. California keys its export on the filing organization and not on the system, so the two coincide here rather than by definition.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2024 · 1,178 MG system input
Billed 1,045 MG Unbilled authorized 2.61 MG Apparent loss 10.5 MG Real loss 120.4 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,178 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN4189 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 1,045 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ4189 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 2.61 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW4189 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 10.5 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC4189 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 120.4 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE4189 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2024 11.3% 1,178 $134,000
2023 17.6% 1,202 $121,000
2022 13.0% 1,241 $125,000
2021 7.2% 1,239 $98,900
2020 3.5% 1,282 $101,000
2019 3.6% 1,170 $92,600
2018 12.7% 1,320 $133,000
2017 17.7% 1,383 $185,000
2016 16.1% 1,181 $192,000

Comparable systems

The same size band — 3,300–10,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Ramona Municipal Water District3,300–10,000 connections 5.6% FY2025
San Gabriel County Water District3,300–10,000 connections 7.3% FY2024
Hemet3,300–10,000 connections 2.0% FY2025
Sacramento County Water Agency - Mather Sunrise3,300–10,000 connections 30.5% FY2024
Gswc - Norwalk3,300–10,000 connections 6.9% FY2024
Monrovia3,300–10,000 connections 3.4% FY2024
Gswc - Culver City3,300–10,000 connections 5.0% FY2024
Pico Rivera3,300–10,000 connections 3.4% FY2025

Where is it going?

This page says how much — roughly $134,000 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Benicia

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Benicia — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/benicia/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.