California · PWS CA2010009

Bakman Water - Rolling Hills

What Bakman Water - Rolling Hills filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
9.0%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN1692

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 126.5 sheet Sheet1, cell AN1692 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 115.1 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ1692 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Recoverable annually
Not estimable from what DWR publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
Balance check
inapplicable
DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

What the record shows

9.0% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 59% of the 141 California systems that filed that year.

9.0% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 141 California filings for the same yearA strip of 141 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 6.9%. This system is 9.0%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 9.0%California median 6.9%

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. This system did not file a complete residential rate structure — a fixed charge, at least one volumetric tier, and the unit those are quoted in.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

7 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 2 are health-based. 4 resolved, and 3 still open.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Who filed this audit

Bakman Water Company filed 2 separate audits for FY2025, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. Bakman Water Company made one set of decisions and filed it 2 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2025 · 126.5 MG system input
Billed 115.1 MG Unbilled authorized 0.29 MG Apparent loss 0.58 MG Real loss 10.5 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 126.5 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN1692 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 115.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ1692 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 0.29 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW1692 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 0.58 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC1692 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 10.5 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE1692 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2025 9.0% 126.5
2024 9.0% 136.7
2023 9.0% 121.4 $1,310
2022 9.0% 141.9 $1,540
2021 10.0% 134.2 $744
2020 10.0% 131.4 $663
2019 2.8% 113.1 $401

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Modesto - S Turlock (ca5010023)under 1,000 connections 17.2% FY2025
Jacoby Creek Water Districtunder 1,000 connections 10.0% FY2024
Gswc - Lucerneunder 1,000 connections 28.6% FY2024
California - American Water Company - Larkfield District - Geyservilleunder 1,000 connections 32.6% FY2024
California - American Water Company - Hillview District - Hillview - Goldsideunder 1,000 connections 3.3% FY2024
Liberty Utilities, Yermounder 1,000 connections 6.9% FY2024
Lake Hemet MWD Garner Valleyunder 1,000 connections 10.1% FY2022
Sacramento County Water Agency - Northgate 880under 1,000 connections 22.6% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page says how much. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters. That takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Bakman Water - Rolling Hills

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here is wrong, it is either wrong in the filing or wrong in our reading of it — tell us which and we will correct the page and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Bakman Water - Rolling Hills — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/bakman-water-rolling-hills/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.