# Pewaukee Water — water loss as filed

PSC · PWS 4625 · filings 2016–2025
https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/city-of-pewaukee-water-utility/

> **Cite as:** Municorn.us, "Pewaukee Water — water loss as filed", Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/city-of-pewaukee-water-utility/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).
> **Licence:** CC BY 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this URL.
> **Caveat that must travel with these figures:** "Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.

## Summary

Pewaukee Water reported **21.6% non-revenue water** in FY2025, higher than 66% of the 562 Wisconsin systems that filed that year. The figure is trending worse across the record.

**The water balance is not a check here.** PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21.6% | 516.5 |
| 2024 | 19.1% | 511.4 |
| 2023 | 13.3% | 512 |
| 2022 | 11.8% | 461.5 |
| 2021 | 9.7% | 474.7 |
| 2020 | 11.3% | 495.6 |
| 2019 | 10.4% | 448.3 |
| 2018 | 13.3% | 465.6 |
| 2017 | 12.0% | 466.4 |
| 2016 | 9.8% | 464.9 |

## What this source cannot say

No filed year on this page carries a retail rate or a production cost, so no figure here is valued. A loss volume
is not a loss in dollars, and this site will not supply a price that was not filed.

## Source

Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, municipal annual report Schedule W-15. Retrieved 2026-09-08. https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ARS/WEGSqueries/default.aspx

The FY2025 loss figure: (system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100, from system input volume at `Sheet1!H394`; billed authorized consumption at `Sheet1!I394` — in `data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv` (sha256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b, retrieved 2026-09-08, https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ARS/WEGSqueries/default.aspx), read by `src/scrape/wi.ts` at 6d6d5f59e8fb.

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

_Municorn.us · https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/city-of-pewaukee-water-utility/ · CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ · source filings retrieved 2026-09-08_

---

## Debt outstanding, and what covers the interest

**$8.5M of long-term debt outstanding at the end of 2025**, across 4 bond issues. This is principal outstanding on the water utility's own balance sheet, on the Commission's own test: it files no electric operating report.

| Year | Debt outstanding | Issues | Net revenue | Interest | Coverage |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| 2025 | $8.5M | 4 | $710,106 | $0 | — |
| 2024 | $9.1M | 5 | $1.2M | $107,317 | 10.76 |
| 2023 | $9.8M | 5 | -$451,971 | $347,885 | -1.30 |
| 2022 | $10.4M | 5 | $588,782 | $224,420 | 2.62 |
| 2021 | $6.2M | 4 | $853,529 | $163,082 | 5.23 |
| 2020 | $6.6M | 4 | $425,042 | $172,551 | 2.46 |
| 2019 | $7.1M | 4 | $244,993 | $181,753 | 1.35 |
| 2018 | $7.6M | 4 | $365,581 | $148,312 | 2.46 |
| 2017 | $6.5M | 3 | $477,947 | $147,354 | 3.24 |
| 2016 | $7.0M | 3 | $362,845 | $112,501 | 3.23 |

This utility filed no interest expense for the year, so there is nothing for a coverage ratio to cover.

Figures are as filed with the Commission under Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 185 and are not audited as presented. Nothing here is a credit opinion, an implied rating, or a judgement that any figure is sufficient.

Source: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, annual report financial schedules, 2016–2025.

<!-- The retrieval date is on the HTML page and in data/archive/manifest.jsonl, and deliberately not here:
     src/build/dist-check.ts flags any corpus twin carrying today's date, because a date that moves with the
     build rewrites every page claim daily. This extract's retrieval date is a real fixed date that happened
     to be today when it was archived, and the check cannot tell those two apart from dist/ alone. The page's
     own citation block already dates it. -->
