# Wills Point — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX2340005 · VAN ZANDT County · filings 2015–2024
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/wills-point/

## Summary

Wills Point reported **26.0% non-revenue water** in FY2024, higher than 68% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$43,817 a year**, as computed in the filed audit itself. **The series is not stable enough to act on**: it moves 14.2 points a year against a Texas median of 5.8.

**The filed balance closes**, to within 0.00% of reported system input.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26.0% | 184.4 | $43,817 | closed |
| 2021 | 27.5% | 181.7 | $109,981 | closed |
| 2020 | 18.6% | 237 | $140,725 | closed |
| 2019 | 24.1% | 204.2 | $143,872 | closed |
| 2018 | 49.3% | 253.7 | $162,354 | closed |
| 2017 | 22.2% | 165.4 | $117,412 | closed |
| 2015 | 39.6% | 227.4 | $89,478 | closed |

`closed` means the filed components sum to the filed input. `failed` means they do not, by the stated residual.
`insufficient` means the check could not run because figures are missing — never to be read as a pass.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as TWDB's
export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the calculation.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-09. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/water-loss-dashboard.asp

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

---