# Mineral Wells — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX1820001 · PALO PINTO County · filings 2015–2022
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/mineral-wells/

## Summary

Mineral Wells reported **48.1% non-revenue water** in FY2022, higher than 95% of the 740 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$691,431 a year**, as computed in the filed audit itself. The figure is trending worse across the record.

**The filed balance closes**, to within 0.00% of reported system input.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 48.1% | 935.7 | $691,431 | closed |
| 2021 | 49.8% | 888.7 | $568,342 | closed |
| 2020 | 42.6% | 835.1 | $243,016 | closed |
| 2019 | 41.2% | 769.8 | $211,023 | closed |
| 2018 | 39.0% | 846.8 | $246,486 | closed |
| 2017 | 48.7% | 816.3 | $328,001 | closed |
| 2016 | 36.6% | 706 | $263,439 | closed |
| 2015 | 41.1% | 750.9 | $347,387 | closed |

`closed` means the filed components sum to the filed input. `failed` means they do not, by the stated residual.
`insufficient` means the check could not run because figures are missing — never to be read as a pass.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as TWDB's
export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the calculation.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-09. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/water-loss-dashboard.asp

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

---