# Graham — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX2520001 · YOUNG County · filings 2015–2024
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/graham/

## Summary

Graham reported **7.0% non-revenue water** in FY2024, higher than 10% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$96,659 a year**, as computed in the filed audit itself.

**The filed balance closes**, to within 0.00% of reported system input.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7.0% | 1,117 | $96,659 | closed |
| 2023 | 12.0% | 871.1 | $222,600 | closed |
| 2022 | 8.9% | 682.9 | $178,992 | closed |
| 2021 | 7.6% | 658.4 | $117,423 | closed |
| 2020 | 11.7% | 638 | $119,586 | closed |
| 2019 | 10.8% | 596.8 | $141,579 | closed |
| 2018 | 24.7% | 705.3 | $698,615 | closed |
| 2017 | 36.9% | 562.2 | $653,339 | closed |
| 2016 | 37.5% | 639.4 | $394,158 | closed |
| 2015 | 23.7% | 845.1 | $268,144 | closed |

`closed` means the filed components sum to the filed input. `failed` means they do not, by the stated residual.
`insufficient` means the check could not run because figures are missing — never to be read as a pass.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as TWDB's
export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the calculation.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-09. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/water-loss-dashboard.asp

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

---