# Fort Bend County WCID 8 — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX0790479 · FORT BEND County · filings 2015–2024
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/fort-bend-county-wcid-8/

## Summary

Fort Bend County WCID 8 reported **6.0% non-revenue water** in FY2024, higher than 7% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$3,728 a year**, as computed in the filed audit itself.

**The filed balance closes**, to within 0.00% of reported system input.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.0% | 11.1 | $3,728 | closed |
| 2023 | 1.8% | 13.7 | $1,133 | closed |
| 2022 | 2.5% | 13.6 | $789 | closed |
| 2021 | 8.3% | 7.94 | $1,167 | closed |
| 2020 | 8.0% | 9.88 | $1,157 | closed |
| 2019 | 7.2% | 9.65 | $1,398 | closed |
| 2017 | 2.7% | 10.9 | $565 | closed |
| 2016 | 2.8% | 11.4 | $629 | closed |
| 2015 | 2.9% | 12.7 | $710 | closed |

`closed` means the filed components sum to the filed input. `failed` means they do not, by the stated residual.
`insufficient` means the check could not run because figures are missing — never to be read as a pass.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as TWDB's
export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the calculation.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-09. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/water-loss-dashboard.asp

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

---