# Brady — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX1540001 · MCCULLOCH County · filings 2015–2024
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/brady/

## Summary

Brady reported **17.4% non-revenue water** in FY2024, higher than 48% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$109,179 a year**, as computed in the filed audit itself.

**The filed balance closes**, to within 0.00% of reported system input.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17.4% | 335.8 | $109,179 | closed |
| 2023 | 11.5% | 354.7 | $37,992 | closed |
| 2022 | 9.2% | 372 | $29,068 | closed |
| 2021 | 19.0% | 342.5 | $49,590 | closed |
| 2020 | 18.2% | 397.2 | $108,225 | closed |
| 2019 | 13.5% | 367.1 | $73,913 | closed |
| 2018 | 15.2% | 380.3 | $70,951 | closed |
| 2017 | 12.6% | 370.5 | $19,094 | closed |
| 2016 | 13.8% | 367.3 | $21,253 | closed |
| 2015 | 12.1% | 410.7 | $53,969 | closed |

`closed` means the filed components sum to the filed input. `failed` means they do not, by the stated residual.
`insufficient` means the check could not run because figures are missing — never to be read as a pass.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as TWDB's
export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the calculation.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-09. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/water-loss-dashboard.asp

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

---