# Elizabeth, Town Of — water loss as filed

IFA · PWS IN5231007 · filings 2019–2023
https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/elizabeth-town-of/

> **Cite as:** Municorn.us, "Elizabeth, Town Of — water loss as filed", Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/elizabeth-town-of/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).
> **Licence:** CC BY 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this URL.
> **Caveat that must travel with these figures:** "Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.

## Summary

Elizabeth, Town Of reported **an unstated share of non-revenue water** in FY2023.

**The filing does not publish enough components to decompose system input.** Absent: system input volume, billed authorized consumption, unbilled authorized consumption, apparent loss, real loss.

**A filed value that cannot be true.** Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed here. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

- The FY2023 volumes are not published here because the filing contradicts itself — 9,666 gal/person/day implied by this filing's own system input and population.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 |  |  |  | insufficient |
| 2019 | 35.7% | 163.3 | $4,580 | inapplicable |

The Balance column carries more than one verdict on this system. `inapplicable` is a statement about the
source rather than the utility: IFA derives water losses from system input minus
authorized consumption, so the identity holds on every filing where it publishes all the components.
`insufficient` means the filing does not publish enough components to decompose at all. Neither is a pass or a
failure.

## How the cost figure is built

Apparent loss is water delivered and never billed, so it is valued at the retail rate: revenue, recoverable inside a
budget year without capital work. Real loss is valued at variable production cost, because eliminating a leak saves
treatment and pumping rather than retail price. Where the filed audit carries its own cost of losses — as
IFA's export does — those figures are used directly and no rate of ours enters the
calculation.

## Source

Indiana Finance Authority — compiled water loss audit dataset, Appendix B to the biennial report required by IC 8-1-30.8. Retrieved 2026-09-08. https://www.in.gov/ifa/water-loss-audits/

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

_Municorn.us · https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/elizabeth-town-of/ · CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ · source filings retrieved 2026-09-08_

---

## Compliance record

Violations on EPA's record as of 2026Q2: **28** (3 health-based).
Resolved: 25. Archived: 2. **Still open: 1.**

- Notification, Known or Potential LSL — unaddressed, from July 2, 2025

Counted as distinct violations rather than as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken
against a violation. A violation is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported
to EPA; it is not a measurement of the water.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2.